There has always been a debate in the Java community about checked versus unchecked exceptions. Java purists would argue that unchecked exceptions should be used only for conditions you cannot recover from at runtime. On the other hand, in recent years the thinking has shifted a bit (or is it muddled a bit?) with successful frameworks such as Spring promoting heavy use of unchecked exceptions. In the case of lightweight frameworks such as Spring, one of the principal value proposition is the fact that you write very little code to get your job done. Use of unchecked exceptions helps promote that value because you don't need to have try/catch blocks in your code or be forced to declare the exceptions thrown by a method. I believe a significant percentage of software applications are lightweight in nature (see Who produces the most applications software?) with their creators looking for simple, lightweight frameworks such as Spring to get the job done. This is the reason for the widespread adoption and success of such frameworks. For lightweight applications, the use of unchecked exceptions works just fine.
As you move up the chain to more complex applications, the reasoning on exceptions changes. When you have an application with many sub-components written by different groups containing hundreds of thousands of line of code, there is more of a need for rigor and discipline. Building complex software applications is still very difficult and costly. One of the biggest cost in such systems is diagnosing and fixing bugs after the software has been shipped to, and deployed at customer sites. For such systems anything that helps reduce the chances of code problems at development time, or helps diagnose problems after deployment is of immense value. Checked exceptions help towards that goal. Checked exceptions are needed to ensure compile-time detection and enforcement of handling abnormal conditions. Checked exceptions force the developer to think through exception scenarios and code in appropriate exception handlers. These handlers can take appropriate action such as logging state at the time of occurrence of the exception for easy error diagnosis, freeing of any resources for avoiding leaks, applying some corrective business logic such as re-initializing state, or re-casting the exception to fit a service contract. With unchecked exceptions where there is a handler for all exceptions at the top level of the application, all this is not possible.
The natural question that comes to mind is of course - what is considered a complex application and what is considered a lightweight application? Some applications clearly fall in either ends of the complexity spectrum, but many applications fall in a big gray area in between. Complexity also tends to a relative term - complex for one development group may be simple for another. For the majority of such applications in the middle, there is no formula that can be applied to pick the right choice of exception management. The correct approach involves a judicious mix of both checked and unchecked exceptions. I tend to follow the following rules:
- Use checked exceptions for coarse service contracts to external clients you have no control over. Exceptions are part of the formal service contract you are publishing to your clients.
- Use checked exceptions for situations that are likely to occur due to invalid input to your services e.g. client called a login service without providing a user id.
- Use unchecked exceptions within your own service implementation code that performs very basic operations, is exercised very frequently, and where exceptions are unlikely to occur unless there is a very basic flaw in the programming logic. e.g. indexing into a list with an index that is out of bounds. Imagine how painful our code would be if the java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException exception of the widely-used java.util.List::get(int) was a checked exception! In fact I use the List analogy and ask myself if the exception scenario is at the same level as the List indexing example. If it is, I use an unchecked exception; if not I use a checked exception.
- Use unchecked exceptions for conditions from which the program cannot or should not attempt to recover e.g. running out of system memory.
1 comment:
Best article I've read on the checked/unchecked debate. A totally common-sense approach.
Post a Comment